Waar het mis gaat is als een stelletje herzenloze dwazen mensen in hokjes willen steken, er labels op willen plakken en ze gemakshalve maar even alle problemen in de schoenen willen schuiven en als enige oplossing zien dat de ander vertrekt ipv normaal na te denken.
Waar het mis gaat , is als in de naam van een religie vrouwen moeten rondlopen in wat het lijkt , grote zwarte onderbroeken
Waar het mis gaat , is als in de naam van een religie er bommetjes hier en daar worden neergelegd
Waar het mis gaat , is als je de islam beledigd het dan geoorloofd schijnt om maar een prijs op iemand zijn hoofd te zetten
Religie is so wie so een probleem, net als politiek.
tip lees is zelf koranlezen
een waarheid als een koe
Maar je snapt dat dit ook van toepassing is op Christendom en het Jodendom toch? Niets wat je hier beschrijft is uniek voor de Islam...behalve die zwarte onderbroeken....echter als je dat woord vervang in kniekousen en lange rokken tot over de enkels en halsbedekkende kleding dan beschrijf je toch echt Christendom en wat minder gevolueerde Joodse tradities.
Prijs op je hoofd zonder proces....Israel:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1258187.stm
Vrouwen in de Bijbel (en ja...zelf POLYGAMIE....ooooeeee
)
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Genesis 3:16: Adam's role is to be Eve's master. The King James Version (KJV), New International Version (NIV), and Revised Standard Version (RSV) use the term "rule" to describe Adam's role over Eve: "...thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee." The Living Bible uses the term "master". The Modern Language Bible uses "dominate". By implication, all of their descendents are would have the same power imbalance between spouses.[/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
A man could marry (literally "become the master of the woman") as often as he desired. In Genesis 4:19, Lamech became the first known polygamist when he took two wives. Subsequent men who took multiple wives included: Esau with 3 wives; Jacob: 2; Ashur: 2; Gideon: many; Elkanah: 2; David: many; Solomon: 700 wives of royal birth; Rehaboam: 3; Abijah: 14. Jehoram, Joash, Ahab, Jeholachin and Belshazzar also had multiple wives.[/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Genesis 16:2 : Sarah gave permission to her husband Abraham to engage in coïtusual intercourse with her maid, Hagar: "Sarai said unto Abram...I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her." Presumably this was done without the consent of Hagar, who had such a low status in the society of the day that she was required to submit to multiple rapes at her owner's command.[/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Genesis 19:8: The men of Sodom gathered around Lot's house, and asked that he bring his two guests out so that the men can "know" them. This is frequently interpreted as a desire to gang rape the visitors, although other interpretations are possible. Lot offers his two virgin daughters to be raped instead: He is recorded as saying: "I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes." Yet, even after this despicable act, Lot is still regarded as an honorable man, worth saving from the destruction of the city. Allowing one's daughters to be coïtusually assaulted by multiple rapists appears to be treated as a minor transgression, because of the low status of the young women. More details on Genesis 19.[/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Genesis 21:10: A man could simultaneously keep numerous concubines. These were coïtusual partners of an even lower status than a wife was. As implied in this verse she could be dismissed when no longer needed: Sarah is recorded as saying: "...Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac." Abraham had two concubines; Gideon: at least 1; David: many; Nahor: 1; Jacob: 1; Eliphaz: 1; Gideon: 1; Caleb: 2; Manassah: 1; Saul: 1; David: at least 10; Rehoboam: 60; Solomon: 300; an unidentified Levite: 1; Belshazzar: more than 1.[/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
In Exodus 1:15-16, the Pharaoh ordered the midwives to kill all Jewish boys at birth, because of the threat that they might pose to the kingdom. "And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live." The girls, being considered less important, were not seen as a threat; they were allowed to live.[/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Exodus 20 & 21: This is perhaps the most misogynistic pair of chapters in the Bible. A number of verses describe a woman as the property of her father. At marriage, her ownership was transferred to her new husband: [/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]Exodus 20:17 lists the last of the Ten Commandments: "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's." It is important to realize that a manservent and a maidservant were male and female slaves. They were not a hired butler and maid. The tenth commandment forbids coveting your neighbor's house, wife, male slave female slave, animals or anything else that the neighbor owns. The wife is clearly regarded as equivalent to a piece of property.[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Exodus 21:2-4: "If thou buy an Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve: and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing....If his master have given him a wife, and she have born him sons or daughters; the wife and her children shall be her master's, and he shall go out by himself." A slaveowner was permitted to give a woman to his male slave as a wife. There is no indication that women were consulted during this type of transaction. After serving six years, he would leave, but his wife and children would remain slaves of the slaveowner. Again, there is no indication that the woman was consulted on this arrangement,[/FONT]
[FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Exodus 21:7: "And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do." A father could sell his daughter as a slave. Even though a male slave is automatically given his freedom after 6 years, a female slave remained a slave forever.[/FONT][FONT=trebuchet ms,arial,helvetica]
Exodus 22:16-17: The first seventeen verses of Exodus 22 deal with restitution in case of stealing, or damage to, a person's property. Verses 16 and 17 deal with the case of a man who seduces a virgin. This was viewed as a property offense against the woman's father. The woman was expected to marry the seducer. If her father refused to transfer ownership of his daughter to the seducer, the latter was required to required to pay money to her father. The money would be in compensation for the damage to the father's property - his daughter. It would be difficult for a non-virgin to marry.[/FONT]
[/FONT]
En zo kunnen we nog wel eventjes doorgaan...maar ik laat het hier even bij voor wat vrouwen en Christendom aangaat.
Christelijk terrorisme...heeft zelfs zijn eigen wiki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism
Ik heb de Koran gelezen, ik heb de Thora en Thalmud gelezen, ik heb de Bijbel gelezen...in meerdere versies inclusief de King James en de Giddeon.
Ik ben redelijk op de hoogte wat waar staat en ik weet precies dat GEEN van deze drie geloven inhoudelijk heel erg verschillen.
: 
