Volg het forum via Google Nieuws
Ik denk zwz dat het bs is. Misschien omdat je eetlust minder word en je daardoor minder eet en dan afvalt door kcal tekort. Maar ik denk niet dat dat spul je lean kan maken als hoe het overal word beschreven.
www.farmacotherapeutischkompas.nl
Denk dat als ik 1mg/dag had gedaan ik nu een neger was geweest. 2x200mcg voor twee weken en 2x6 min zonnebank was genoeg
Onzin imo, als je twee weken 200/300/400mcg per dag zet en daarna onderhoudt met 1 a 2 keer per week 200-500mcg ben je retenbruin. Je hebt echt geen drie vials nodig.
Ik zet het verre van consistent omdat ik geen zin in sommige sides. Maar als ik het zet is het nooit meer dan 500mcg en heb een prima tan. Laatst mt2 van alibaba gehaald wat echt een lachertje is vergeleken UGL labs. 10x10mg vials voor 80 euro
Onzin imo, als je twee weken 200/300/400mcg per dag zet en daarna onderhoudt met 1 a 2 keer per week 200-500mcg ben je retenbruin. Je hebt echt geen drie vials nodig.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nou moet zeggen dat ik zelf wel degelijk veel kwaliteit verschil heb gemerkt over de jaren, sino pep( was verkrijgbaar voor 2008) en Sunatura waren voormij de beste (de zogenaamde low volume vials) helaas nergens meer te vinden.
Heb ook hetzelfde regime aangehouden als @Gaotan aangeeft nooit meer dan 0.25 om de dag en meestal zelfs maar 0.1mg
Hier nog wat research waarin duidelijk naar voren komt dat er veel verschil in content is bij diverse verkopers:
Identification and characterization by LC-UV-MS/MS of melanotan II skin-tanning products sold illegally on the Internet - PubMed
New methods were developed and validated to determine the identity, contents, and purity of samples of melanotan II, a synthetic melanocortin receptor agonist, sold in vials as injectable skin-tanning products that were purchased from three online shops. Methods were based on liquid...
' The total amount of melanotan II in vials ranged between 4.32 and 8.84 mg, although each shop claimed that vials contained 10 mg melanotan II ''
Kijk de prijs van M1 :Hier de lijst bijwerkingen voor Afamelanotide = Melanotan 1 ( uiteraard kunnen deze compleet anders zijn voor mt2 )
afamelanotide
Hier nog wat info van het oude melanotan forum over de verschillen tussen 1 en 2:
When assessing a potential peptide sequence for effectiveness, there are 3 issues to consider: binding affinity or potency, selectivity, and stability.
In studies carried out on amphibians or lizards, all natural MSH peptides (alpha, beta, and gamma) had the following order of potency at the melanocortic receptor sites.
MC1 > MC3 > MC4 > MC5
Selectivity refers to how strongly the binding of the peptide is at one receptor site compared to the others. In the case of natural alpha-MSH, this peptide is very selective to the MC-1R receptor. Interestingly, while the beta-MSH and gamma-MSH are almost as selective as alpha-MSH at the MC-1R site, they are an order of magnitude less potent.
But, all natural MSH peptides lack stability and so their effects are short-lived.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Now, as I look over my stats for the syntheic melanocortic peptides, namely melanotan one (NDP-MSH) and melanotan II, I see the following differences.
Melanotan-I has the same binding affinity order as natural alpha-MSH:
MC1 > MC3 > MC4 > MC5
However, melanotan II has a slight twist with its ordering ...
MC1 > MC4 > MC3 > MC5
Next, Melanotan-I is the most potent peptide at the MC-1R site, followed closely by natural a-MSH and somewhat closely by melanotan II. Without describing exactly how potency is measured, I'll just present the values at the MC-1R where the lower number means more potent ...
melanotan one = 0.085
a-MSH = 0.12
melanotan II = 0.67
Also, interestingly Melanotan-I is the most potent peptide at each of the other receptors compared to natural a-MSH and melanotan II. However, because Melanotan-I is a relatively lengthy linear peptide, it generally cannot cross the blood-brain barrier into the brain to make its impact on the MC-4R receptor when administered centrally as well as melanotan II can. Since melanotan II is a short cyclic peptide and it can cross the bbb with ease, its effects at MC-4R are noticeable.
Neither synthetic peptide is ultra selective at any particular receptor site. However, in comparison melanotan II is most selective at the MC-1R and MC-4R sites whereas, Melanotan-I will basically bind with any receptor it comes into contact with.
Both of these peptides are more stable than compared to natural a-MSH and so their effects will last much longer.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
So, in conclusion .. the answer to which peptide works best for tanning? This fight goes to Melanotan-I.
Why then does Melanotan-I require more of a dose than melanotan II to achieve the same degree of tanning? For example, Melanotan-I was given at 0.16mg/kg and melanotan II was administered at 0.020mg/kg.
The answer is simple. The Amino Acid count for the linear Melanotan-I peptide is approximately twice that of the cyclic melanotan II. Also taking into consideration the difference in weight of various AAs that make up each peptide, 1mg of melanotan II packs many more individual AA chains than does 1mg of Melanotan-I. Thus, the more singular peptides you have per mg, the more receptors you will bind. This means I can activate an order of magnitude more melanocytes to induce melanogenisis with melanotan II than I can given an equally weighted amount of Melanotan-I.
You can think of it like this. If each item in my bag of groceries will have an almost similar effect, I would rather have the bag full of marble-sized items than the bag of lemon-sized items to experiment with. To achieve the same effect with the lemons, I'd need like 10 bags or something.
This is why many experimentors choose to use melanotan II for tanning even though Melanotan-I works better. It is more cost effective to do so.
| SCENESSE, IMPLANTAAT 16MG | € 15.370,04 |
ja waarom niet? sommige zetten 1 mg per dag zelfs
Col_inc zet een halve vial.
Het is zoals hoxyz zegt echt dirt cheap.
