AndroidHealthClinic

Bostin Loyd 21 Jarige Bodybuilder over AAS

Elke competitieve atleet die gesponsord wordt of wilt worden om de rekeningen te betalen zal niks zeggen.

Alleen de anonieme / gepensioneerde zullen een boekje eventueel open willen doen, of mensen zoals Boston die geen sponsor nodig heeft en een verhoogde kans zal krijgen politiek tegen gesproken te worden in wedstrijden.


Uiteraard en ook wel logisch, ach ja iedereen weet toch wel hoe het echt zit, althans, 'wij' de geïnteresseerde.

Maar de beginner die door de flex baldert denkt te groeien op supplementen van 40 euro of meer per potje.

Voordat hij terug gefloten werd,

 
Laatst bewerkt:
Jon het niet laten. wil de waanzin aan doseringen nog een keer posten.

Onderstaande wordt dus aanbevolen off season voor een pro
Kan toch niet?






thats a cycle a npc competitor layed out on anonther board:
Perusing this board I couldnt help but notice the constant references to "cycles" with relatively low levels of testosterone, complaints about how testosterone makes you look "puffy," how other anabolics are so much superior to testosterone and even read someone suggest trenbolone as a first cycle.

If you have zero interest in becoming a successful bodybuilder then by all means pursue drug stacks with low - or zero - testosterone.

The fact of the matter is testosterone is the single most important drug in bodybuilding. First off, the concept of "cycles" is a terrible idea if you are trying to develop an outstanding physique. Do not ever come off testosterone, this should be common sense. You need higher testosterone levels than the human male will naturally produce to maintain - and obviously build - an impressive amount of muscle mass. A typical pro (or any successful bodybuilder for that matter) would have an offseason drug stack based around the "blast and cruise" concept. For example:

Weeks 1-12
4,000mg testosterone in various esters
200mg TNE pre workout
100mg dbol pre workout
100mg anadrol pre workout
1,050mg trenbolone acetate per week
2,000mg equipoise
1,050mg npp
1,000mg deca durabolin
32iu serostim daily
IM 15iu humalog prior to every meal
IM 30iu humalog prior to training
120mcg IGF-1 injected bilaterally in muscles trained

Weeks 13-16
2,000mg testosterone in various esters
16iu serostim daily
1,000mg equipoise
1,000mg deca durabolin

REPEAT to some degree, changing varying drug doses etc.

The point is that testosterone is necessary in large doses to promote muscle growth and size and to maintain that same muscle. In fact, there are a number of current pros whose offseason drugs are simply testosterone, deca, hgh and insulin. Trenbolone, equipoise, etc. often have an extremely amplified effect on metabolism and make it harder to gain weight when testosterone assists in letting most nutrients go into muscular (and yes, fat) storage.

The biggest bodybuilders are on the most testosterone, end of story.
 
Jon het niet laten. wil de waanzin aan doseringen nog een keer posten.

Onderstaande wordt dus aanbevolen off season voor een pro
Kan toch niet?






thats a cycle a npc competitor layed out on anonther board:
Perusing this board I couldnt help but notice the constant references to "cycles" with relatively low levels of testosterone, complaints about how testosterone makes you look "puffy," how other anabolics are so much superior to testosterone and even read someone suggest trenbolone as a first cycle.

If you have zero interest in becoming a successful bodybuilder then by all means pursue drug stacks with low - or zero - testosterone.

The fact of the matter is testosterone is the single most important drug in bodybuilding. First off, the concept of "cycles" is a terrible idea if you are trying to develop an outstanding physique. Do not ever come off testosterone, this should be common sense. You need higher testosterone levels than the human male will naturally produce to maintain - and obviously build - an impressive amount of muscle mass. A typical pro (or any successful bodybuilder for that matter) would have an offseason drug stack based around the "blast and cruise" concept. For example:

Weeks 1-12
4,000mg testosterone in various esters
200mg TNE pre workout
100mg dbol pre workout
100mg anadrol pre workout
1,050mg trenbolone acetate per week
2,000mg equipoise
1,050mg npp
1,000mg deca durabolin
32iu serostim daily
IM 15iu humalog prior to every meal
IM 30iu humalog prior to training
120mcg IGF-1 injected bilaterally in muscles trained

Weeks 13-16
2,000mg testosterone in various esters
16iu serostim daily
1,000mg equipoise
1,000mg deca durabolin

REPEAT to some degree, changing varying drug doses etc.

The point is that testosterone is necessary in large doses to promote muscle growth and size and to maintain that same muscle. In fact, there are a number of current pros whose offseason drugs are simply testosterone, deca, hgh and insulin. Trenbolone, equipoise, etc. often have an extremely amplified effect on metabolism and make it harder to gain weight when testosterone assists in letting most nutrients go into muscular (and yes, fat) storage.

The biggest bodybuilders are on the most testosterone, end of story.

Waarom kan dat niet? Verbaast me niks dat ze zoveel derin spuiten.
 
Jon het niet laten. wil de waanzin aan doseringen nog een keer posten.

Onderstaande wordt dus aanbevolen off season voor een pro
Kan toch niet?






thats a cycle a npc competitor layed out on anonther board:
Perusing this board I couldnt help but notice the constant references to "cycles" with relatively low levels of testosterone, complaints about how testosterone makes you look "puffy," how other anabolics are so much superior to testosterone and even read someone suggest trenbolone as a first cycle.

If you have zero interest in becoming a successful bodybuilder then by all means pursue drug stacks with low - or zero - testosterone.

The fact of the matter is testosterone is the single most important drug in bodybuilding. First off, the concept of "cycles" is a terrible idea if you are trying to develop an outstanding physique. Do not ever come off testosterone, this should be common sense. You need higher testosterone levels than the human male will naturally produce to maintain - and obviously build - an impressive amount of muscle mass. A typical pro (or any successful bodybuilder for that matter) would have an offseason drug stack based around the "blast and cruise" concept. For example:

Weeks 1-12
4,000mg testosterone in various esters
200mg TNE pre workout
100mg dbol pre workout
100mg anadrol pre workout
1,050mg trenbolone acetate per week
2,000mg equipoise
1,050mg npp
1,000mg deca durabolin
32iu serostim daily
IM 15iu humalog prior to every meal
IM 30iu humalog prior to training
120mcg IGF-1 injected bilaterally in muscles trained

Weeks 13-16
2,000mg testosterone in various esters
16iu serostim daily
1,000mg equipoise
1,000mg deca durabolin

REPEAT to some degree, changing varying drug doses etc.

The point is that testosterone is necessary in large doses to promote muscle growth and size and to maintain that same muscle. In fact, there are a number of current pros whose offseason drugs are simply testosterone, deca, hgh and insulin. Trenbolone, equipoise, etc. often have an extremely amplified effect on metabolism and make it harder to gain weight when testosterone assists in letting most nutrients go into muscular (and yes, fat) storage.

The biggest bodybuilders are on the most testosterone, end of story.
nep man
 
Jon het niet laten. wil de waanzin aan doseringen nog een keer posten.

Onderstaande wordt dus aanbevolen off season voor een pro
Kan toch niet?






thats a cycle a npc competitor layed out on anonther board:
Perusing this board I couldnt help but notice the constant references to "cycles" with relatively low levels of testosterone, complaints about how testosterone makes you look "puffy," how other anabolics are so much superior to testosterone and even read someone suggest trenbolone as a first cycle.

If you have zero interest in becoming a successful bodybuilder then by all means pursue drug stacks with low - or zero - testosterone.

The fact of the matter is testosterone is the single most important drug in bodybuilding. First off, the concept of "cycles" is a terrible idea if you are trying to develop an outstanding physique. Do not ever come off testosterone, this should be common sense. You need higher testosterone levels than the human male will naturally produce to maintain - and obviously build - an impressive amount of muscle mass. A typical pro (or any successful bodybuilder for that matter) would have an offseason drug stack based around the "blast and cruise" concept. For example:

Weeks 1-12
4,000mg testosterone in various esters
200mg TNE pre workout
100mg dbol pre workout
100mg anadrol pre workout
1,050mg trenbolone acetate per week
2,000mg equipoise
1,050mg npp
1,000mg deca durabolin
32iu serostim daily
IM 15iu humalog prior to every meal
IM 30iu humalog prior to training
120mcg IGF-1 injected bilaterally in muscles trained

Weeks 13-16
2,000mg testosterone in various esters
16iu serostim daily
1,000mg equipoise
1,000mg deca durabolin

REPEAT to some degree, changing varying drug doses etc.

The point is that testosterone is necessary in large doses to promote muscle growth and size and to maintain that same muscle. In fact, there are a number of current pros whose offseason drugs are simply testosterone, deca, hgh and insulin. Trenbolone, equipoise, etc. often have an extremely amplified effect on metabolism and make it harder to gain weight when testosterone assists in letting most nutrients go into muscular (and yes, fat) storage.

The biggest bodybuilders are on the most testosterone, end of story.


Nooit in mijn leven dat ik dit durf te spuiten dat is 15+ ml in je lichaam man, krijg al flink pijn als ik 1 ml in mn delt spuit laat staan 15 +
 
Uiteraard en ook wel logisch, ach ja iedereen weet toch wel hoe het echt zit, althans, 'wij' de geïnteresseerde.

Maar de beginner die door de flex baldert denkt te groeien op supplementen van 40 euro of meer per potje.

Voordat hij terug gefloten werd,



Interessant, geeft hier dus gewoon AAS gebruik toe.
 
Jon het niet laten. wil de waanzin aan doseringen nog een keer posten.

Onderstaande wordt dus aanbevolen off season voor een pro
Kan toch niet?






thats a cycle a npc competitor layed out on anonther board:
Perusing this board I couldnt help but notice the constant references to "cycles" with relatively low levels of testosterone, complaints about how testosterone makes you look "puffy," how other anabolics are so much superior to testosterone and even read someone suggest trenbolone as a first cycle.

If you have zero interest in becoming a successful bodybuilder then by all means pursue drug stacks with low - or zero - testosterone.

The fact of the matter is testosterone is the single most important drug in bodybuilding. First off, the concept of "cycles" is a terrible idea if you are trying to develop an outstanding physique. Do not ever come off testosterone, this should be common sense. You need higher testosterone levels than the human male will naturally produce to maintain - and obviously build - an impressive amount of muscle mass. A typical pro (or any successful bodybuilder for that matter) would have an offseason drug stack based around the "blast and cruise" concept. For example:

Weeks 1-12
4,000mg testosterone in various esters
200mg TNE pre workout
100mg dbol pre workout
100mg anadrol pre workout
1,050mg trenbolone acetate per week
2,000mg equipoise
1,050mg npp
1,000mg deca durabolin
32iu serostim daily
IM 15iu humalog prior to every meal
IM 30iu humalog prior to training
120mcg IGF-1 injected bilaterally in muscles trained

Weeks 13-16
2,000mg testosterone in various esters
16iu serostim daily
1,000mg equipoise
1,000mg deca durabolin

REPEAT to some degree, changing varying drug doses etc.

The point is that testosterone is necessary in large doses to promote muscle growth and size and to maintain that same muscle. In fact, there are a number of current pros whose offseason drugs are simply testosterone, deca, hgh and insulin. Trenbolone, equipoise, etc. often have an extremely amplified effect on metabolism and make it harder to gain weight when testosterone assists in letting most nutrients go into muscular (and yes, fat) storage.

The biggest bodybuilders are on the most testosterone, end of story.

Dat is 11gr AAS per week????
Zelfmoord

---------- Post toegevoegd 30 August 2013 om 10:09 ----------


@Cools: wat denk je van dit kuurvoorstel?
hahahahah:D;);)
 
filmpie is al zo oud.
 
Updates?
 
hij heb nu gewoon al big gut en ze posing skillz zuigen ook!!!!
 
Valt wel heel erg tegen, gast zn laagste dosering is al 500- 1 gram test zei die een keer. dat is zijn ''trt'' dosering
 
Valt wel heel erg tegen, gast zn laagste dosering is al 500- 1 gram test zei die een keer. dat is zijn ''trt'' dosering

hij heeft het idd echt niet in hem om hoge toppen te scoren, die gut alleen al terwijl hij ook nog niet eens die typische monsterachtige massa heeft, dat ziet er niet goed uit over een paar jaar.
 
Zijn fysiek is ZEER goed voor zijn AAS gebruik, jullie denken allemaal dat je van een paar gram AAS een IFBB pro wordt... dan zal ik jullie even uit je droom helpen... vergeet het maar.
Zoals in die lange post over doseringen hierboven moet je aan 5 gram+ AAS (reken maar dat de meeste veel meer gebruiken) per week denken, 20-30iu HGH en HONDERDEN iu's insuline.
Bostin Loyd gebruikte dan wel een paar gram AAS, hij gebruikte maar 4iu HGH (ook nog hygetropin, niet echt top kwaliteit) en ik geloof zo'n 20-30iu insuline.
De pro's gebruiken dus 10 keer zoveel HGH en insuline als Bostin Loyd, HGH en insuline is wat massa monters maakt (zoals de IFBB pro's), AAS doet dit niet.
 
Terug
Naar boven