AndroidHealthClinic

eiwitten, aminozuren en insuline?

rnbflavour

Freaky Bodybuilder
Lid sinds
28 aug 2006
Berichten
4.644
Waardering
64
wekt whey veel insuline op?
wekken BCAA's veel insuline op?
werken essentie aminozuren veel insuline op?
wekt wei hydrolisaat veel insuline op?
 
1. nee, niet bijzonder veel
2. nee
3. nee
4 = 1+2+3 = nee

En wat is veel? Veel vergeleken met pure dextrose of ... ?

zoek eens op glucogene aminozuren bij google of hier.
 
Zoals ik je al in een ander topic had uitgelegd..

Nee, aminozuren wekken geen insuline op. Insuline stimuleert de synthese van eiwitten in spierweefsel, maar word alleen opgewekt door glycogeenspiegel verhogende stoffen.

Whey kan een klein beetje insuline opwekken, niet door de eiwitten, maar omdat whey altijd wel een beetje koolhydraten bevat.
 
Oh ja...en BCAA's zijn essentiele aminozuren, dus die hoe je niet apart te vermelden. ;)
 
  • Topic Starter Topic Starter
  • #5
maar van 3xl begreep ik dat wei hydrolisaat bijzonder veel insuline kon opwekken.

of ik heb hem verkeerd geinterpeteerd.


aminozuren hebben toch insuline nodig net als glucose om getransporteerd te worden naar en in de spiercel?
 
Zoals ik je al in een ander topic had uitgelegd..

Nee, aminozuren wekken geen insuline op. Insuline stimuleert de synthese van eiwitten in spierweefsel, maar word alleen opgewekt door glycogeenspiegel verhogende stoffen.

Whey kan een klein beetje insuline opwekken, niet door de eiwitten, maar omdat whey altijd wel een beetje koolhydraten bevat.

dat zijn dus producten waar koolhydraten in zitten, zowel complexe als simpele koolhydraten of wat verhoogt nou het beste dan je insuline spiegel? (buiten insuline spuiten ea AS natuurlijk ;))
 
  • Topic Starter Topic Starter
  • #7
heeft hier iemand een onderzoek waar word gemeten wat eiwitten met de hoeveelheid insuline in het bloed doet?
 
  • Topic Starter Topic Starter
  • #8
vanuit het topic: http://forum.dutchbodybuilding.com/f9/vetten-carbs-scheiden-niet-114412/

The following interview was conducted by Josh Beaty with Layne Norton ;), Jamie Hale, Alan Aragon and Will Brink.

J Beaty: What are your thoughts on the reemergence of the macronutrient food combining theory where carbs shouldn't be mixed with protein/fat meals and fat shouldn't be mixed with protein/carb meals?

L Norton: This is a rather simplistic way of looking at nutrition and focuses mainly on insulin rather than looking at the whole picture. While it probably isn't a good idea to have a really high carb meal with a really high fat meal, there's nothing wrong with having moderate amounts of both.

W Brink: like many theories, it comes around every few years or decades and gets people all worked up over their food. Problem is, it's no more true today then it was when the book Fit for Life by Harvey and Marilyn Diamond came out. The theory had no scientific support then and it has none now. Humans have been combining fats, carbs, and proteins quite successfully for eons and as omnivores, are perfectly capable of digesting mixed meals.

J Hale: You are probably referring to the theory that assumes insulin and blood levels of fat should never be raised at the same time. This theory assumes that insulin is the key contributor to obesity. There are a few things wrong with this line of thought. One of the key problems is not recognizing something called Acylation Stimulating Protein. Acylation stimulating protein (ASP) is a hormone produced by adipocytes and is of importance for the storage of energy as fat. The consumption of dietary fat alone can increase fat storage. Dietary fat affects fat cell metabolism with NO INCREASE in insulin. Some studies have indicated dietary fat loading found a decrease in HSL (hormone sensitive lipase) and an activation of fat storage despite no increase in insulin. The key reason was activation of acylation stimulating protein (ASP) which is activated by the presence of chylomicrons (basically packaged triglycerides that are found in the bloodstream after the meal). ASP increases glucose uptake into the fat cell, increases insulin release from the pancreas and has been described as 'the most potent stimulator of triglyceride storage' in the fat cells by numerous scientists. Another problem with this line of thought is some proteins causes substantial elevations in insulin. Minimal levels of insulin affect fat cell metabolism. Basal levels can decrease lipolysis by 50%. Another consideration is most bodybuilders are eating every 2-3 hrs so nutrients are still absorbing from previous meals; therefore previous meals interact with the blood levels of nutrients of the present meal.

A study conducted by Golay and colleagues compared a diet with equal macronutrient content and substrate percentages; that differed only in how the substrates were consumed (mixed diet vs. food combining). The results were no difference in weight loss. Here are the exact results reported by the researchers. “Results: There was no significant difference in the amount of weight loss in response to dissociated (6.2 +/- 0.6 kg) or balanced (7.5 +/- 0.4 kg) diets. Furthermore, significant decreases in total body fat and waist-to-hip circumference ratio were seen in both groups, and the magnitude of the changes did not vary as a function of the diet composition. Fasting plasma glucose, insulin, total cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations decreased significantly and similarly in patients receiving both diets. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure values decreased significantly in patients eating balanced diets. The results of this study show that both diets achieved similar weight loss. Total fat weight loss was higher in balanced diets, although differences did not reach statistical significance. Total lean body mass was identically spared in both groups. CONCLUSION: In summary at identical energy intake and similar substrate composition, the dissociated (or 'food combining') diet did not bring any additional loss in weight and body fat”. Actually looks like a slight increase in fat loss with mixed diet (balanced diet). We have tons of anecdotal evidence that denies the need for food combining. We have evolved on a mixed diet. With all of that said food combining may be beneficial regarding calorie control. Once you eliminate an entire macronutrient from a meal this can go a long way in decreasing total caloric intake. If this is what you need to do to control energy intake feel free to do so.

A Aragon: I think that the “P+C & P+F = okay but avoid C+F” principle is idiotic when applied across the board without any contingencies or attention to individual situations. For example, if someone is low-carbing for whatever reason you choose (pathological carbophobia included), they might be done with their carb intake by early afternoon, and their meal construction for the rest of the day is gonna be primarily P+F by sheer default. In the latter scenario, I can see the principle being legit. However, when issued blanketly, it’s usually based upon the wacky idea that you don’t want fat floating around systemically when your insulin levels are high, because this will magically shift your net adipose balance in the positive. That’s false for a number of reasons. First of all, the insulin response generated by CHO + fat generally depends upon the degree of the fat’s saturation. Unsaturated fats tend to either lower insulin response of the coingested carbs, or not affect insulin response at all. Coingested sat fat, on the other hand, tends to raise insulin response, and can do so in a synergistic fashion. But then the question becomes, so what? Others have mentioned the more direct role ASP has in TG synthesis, and indeed, insulin is more of a multi-tasking anabolic/anticatabolic agent in comparison to ASP, which seems to exist solely to pump up the adipocytes. And of course the kicker is that ASP can do its TG-synthesizing magic in the sheer absence of insulin.

And then there’s energy balance… In a negative energy balance, insulinogenesis is wonderful thing, as long as the training stimulus & nutrition is there to work in concert with it to preserve LBM. In the condition of a positive energy balance, trainees in general are gonna have a lot more carbs to throw around, so this makes the whole separation thing even more dicey. Which meals should be carb-free or fat-free in order to pull of this magic separation tactic, and why? The logical answers to this question simply don’t exist. If you were to actually adhere to the mechanics of separation, you’d actually be hard-pressed to maintain a stable insulin profile – which is ironic, since the control of insulin is what “separatists” are aiming for. Regardless of all the previous points, the fundamental shortsight is that digestion/absorption of meals overlap each other when meal frequency is as high as it should be. Therefore, attempting strict separation of the macros = kidding yourself. Not to mention, most foods in nature are a combo of all the macros to begin with. :cool:
 
wekt whey veel insuline op?
wekken BCAA's veel insuline op?
werken essentie aminozuren veel insuline op?
wekt wei hydrolisaat veel insuline op?


Licht er naturlijk aan met wat je het verglijkt, maar als je dit doorleest http://forum.dutchbodybuilding.com/...tes-sports-and-exercise-a-brief-review-98756/

Is het antwoord op de laatste dus "ja". en op de tweede "minder"

Op de eerste, aleen valine is enkel glucogeen, leucine is ketogeen en isoleucine glucogeen en ketogeen.

Ik denk dus dat de insulineafgifte matig zal zijn
 
  • Topic Starter Topic Starter
  • #11
Natuurlijk wel. Neem alleen maar losse aminozuren, geen koolhydraat te bekennen, maar toch een insuline response



btw je hebt pm ;)



maar bedankt voor je info......
jij bent dus ervan overtuigd dat wei hydrolisaat voldoende anti catabool is en je dus geen extra dextro nodig hebt na de training?
 
Natuurlijk wel. Neem alleen maar losse aminozuren, geen koolhydraat te bekennen, maar toch een insuline response

Als aminozuren glucogeen zijn dan is het een ander verhaal uiteraard, dit wist ik niet, zal me er eens in verdiepen.
 
btw je hebt pm ;)



maar bedankt voor je info......
jij bent dus ervan overtuigd dat wei hydrolisaat voldoende anti catabool is en je dus geen extra dextro nodig hebt na de training?


Er zijn ketogene en glucogene aminozuren. Als je lichaam glucose nodig heeft, zet het de glucogene aminozuren om in glucose. O.a. glutamine en alanine zijn glucogene aminozuren. Het zou zonde zijn om geen koolhydraten in je lichaam te stoppen als het daar om vraagt, want dan gaat het óf je glucogene aminozuren uit je wei gebruiken óf glutamine en alanine uit je spierweefsel.
 
wekt whey veel insuline op?
wekken BCAA's veel insuline op?
werken essentie aminozuren veel insuline op?
wekt wei hydrolisaat veel insuline op?

Er zijn wel bewijzen dat L-Leucine de insuline-gevoeligheid kan verhogen. Vooral 4-hydroxyiso-Leucine is hier erg goed in.

Ik zal het zo eens opzoeken, eerst even eten :meal:
 
Gevonden:

We have recently shown in vitro that 4-hydroxyisoleucine (4-OH-Ile), an amino acid extracted from fenugreek seeds, potentiates insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. The present study was designed to investigate whether 4-OH-Ile could exert in vivo insulinotropic and antidiabetic properties. For this purpose, intravenous or oral glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs and OGTTs, respectively) were performed not only in normal animals but also in a type II diabetes rat model. During IVGTT in normal rats or OGTT in normal dogs, 4-OH-Ile (18 mg/kg) improved glucose tolerance. The lactonic form of 4-OH-Ile was ineffective in normal rats. In non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDD) rats, a single intravenous administration of 4-OH-Ile (50 mg/kg) partially restored glucose-induced insulin response without affecting glucose tolerance; a 6-day subchronic administration of 4-OH-Ile (50 mg/kg, daily) reduced basal hyperglycemia, decreased basal insulinemia, and slightly, but significantly, improved glucose tolerance. In vitro, 4-OH-Ile (200 microM) potentiated glucose (16.7 mM)-induced insulin release from NIDD rat-isolated islets. So, the antidiabetic effects of 4-OH-Ile on NIDD rats result, at least in part, from a direct pancreatic B cell stimulation.

Entrez PubMed

Het gaat erom dat er meer insuline wordt vrijgelaten door de stof.
 
Arginine stimuleert ook de aanmaak van insuline, glucagon en groeihormoon.
 
Als je zo graag de aanmaak van insuline wilt verhogen koop je je toch wat insuline? Tegenover HGH kost het geen drol.





jk:D
 
Zou het niet kunnen dat ,mensen juist geen- of een hele lage insuline response rondom hun training wensen en daarvoor eiwit nemen.
 
Terug
Naar boven