Europese Asielcrisis
- Topic starter Arminius
- Startdatum
- Recente activiteit Recente activiteit:
- Reacties 3.187
- Weergaven 162.933
- Volgers 62
- Lid sinds
- 23 dec 2012
- Berichten
- 15.375
- Waardering
- 7.570
- Lengte
- 1m64
- Massa
- 74kg
Die lag eerst ergens anders. Ze hebben hem verlegd om mooiere fotos te kunnen maken.
Alsook ze zaten in een veilig land,maar de vader wilde naar Canada reizen omdat hij daar gratis een nieuw gebit kon laten steken.Maar dit zeggen ze natuurlijk niet in de media.
Als de papa geen nieuwe tandjes wilde dan leefde dat jongetje nog.
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 59.513
- Waardering
- 22.094
Vieze jij
Huge Freak
- Lid sinds
- 3 okt 2012
- Berichten
- 7.080
- Waardering
- 9.714
- Lengte
- 1m92
- Massa
- 130kg
- Vetpercentage
- 14%
De autochtone Duitse bevolking veroudert nu snel. In het Duitse pensioensysteem op omslagbasis moet vermogen opgebracht worden door percentueel steeds meer jonge allochtonen die dat geld niet kunnen opbrengen. Waar moet dat pensioengeld vandaan komen. Een nieuw Wirtschaftswunder? Zorgwekkend.
“Wir schaffen das” leidt er toe dat de Duitse staat jaarlijks 22 tot 25 miljard euro voor immigranten moet reserveren, terwijl ze bijna geen bijdrage tot de economie te leveren. Onduidelijk is hoe het land de extra kosten voor gezondheidszorg, defensie en investeringen in infrastructuur, pensioenen en EU uitgaven zal kunnen ophoesten. Duitsland is op het gebied van informatie technologie een volstrekt ontwikkelingsland. De komende jaren zullen de vruchten van kunstmatige intelligentie en robotica als een deken over ons uitgerold worden. Midden- en hoger kader in Duitsland die nu nog in afgrijzen praten over ‘die grausame Populisten’ zullen aan den lijven voelen wat de lagere klassen al enige decennia ondervinden, namelijk werkloosheid en achteruitgang qua inkomen en vermogen. Dat is het moment dat de SPD weer zal opkrabbelen.
lol,17% van de Duitsers leeft onder de armoedegrens,7 miljoen minijobs van 450,00 en weinig Duitsers hebben bezit of vermogen
maar wel 25 miljard per jaar aan onrendabelen uitgeven ,mooi die linkse logica
“Wir schaffen das” leidt er toe dat de Duitse staat jaarlijks 22 tot 25 miljard euro voor immigranten moet reserveren, terwijl ze bijna geen bijdrage tot de economie te leveren. Onduidelijk is hoe het land de extra kosten voor gezondheidszorg, defensie en investeringen in infrastructuur, pensioenen en EU uitgaven zal kunnen ophoesten. Duitsland is op het gebied van informatie technologie een volstrekt ontwikkelingsland. De komende jaren zullen de vruchten van kunstmatige intelligentie en robotica als een deken over ons uitgerold worden. Midden- en hoger kader in Duitsland die nu nog in afgrijzen praten over ‘die grausame Populisten’ zullen aan den lijven voelen wat de lagere klassen al enige decennia ondervinden, namelijk werkloosheid en achteruitgang qua inkomen en vermogen. Dat is het moment dat de SPD weer zal opkrabbelen.
lol,17% van de Duitsers leeft onder de armoedegrens,7 miljoen minijobs van 450,00 en weinig Duitsers hebben bezit of vermogen
maar wel 25 miljard per jaar aan onrendabelen uitgeven ,mooi die linkse logica
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 23.682
- Waardering
- 21.437
Hoorde gister dat de Europese Unie inmiddels inziet dat andere landen verplichten tot opnemen migranten en de herverdeling niet werkt. Er moet meer gedaan worden aan het voorkomen van de enorme stroom migranten. Grenzen beter controleren (minder open bv), en er alles aan doen om opnieuw chaos te voorkomen. Toch gek, wanneer je enkele jaren terug dergelijke woorden bezigde was je een racist en/of kamp Wilders (of hitler) maar nu de europese volgevreten subsidieslurpers het melden is het een redelijke beslissing. Heb nog niks van de media vernomen dat doet denken aan de hetze van toentertijd tegen andersdenkenden.maar wel 25 miljard per jaar aan onrendabelen uitgeven ,mooi die linkse logica
- Lid sinds
- 23 dec 2012
- Berichten
- 15.375
- Waardering
- 7.570
- Lengte
- 1m64
- Massa
- 74kg
iets wat zelfs mensen met een gewoon iq al jaren zeggen,en op voorhand voorspelden. Maar de intelligente leiders komer er steeds pas veel later achter.
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 23.682
- Waardering
- 21.437
Nu komen ze met dit, waarom zitten die lui daar nog. Met welk mandaat?
EU wil 50.000 vluchtelingen opnemen: vergoeding 10.000 euro per migrant
EU wil 50.000 vluchtelingen opnemen: vergoeding 10.000 euro per migrant
Cookies op AD.nl | AD.nl
- Lid sinds
- 23 dec 2012
- Berichten
- 15.375
- Waardering
- 7.570
- Lengte
- 1m64
- Massa
- 74kg
Helemaal op hun kop gevallen. Grenzen niet willen sluiten zal het eerder zijn.
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 23.682
- Waardering
- 21.437
- Lid sinds
- 24 aug 2009
- Berichten
- 21.667
- Waardering
- 12.184
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 59.513
- Waardering
- 22.094
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 59.513
- Waardering
- 22.094
Vieze jij
Huge Freak
- Lid sinds
- 3 okt 2012
- Berichten
- 7.080
- Waardering
- 9.714
- Lengte
- 1m92
- Massa
- 130kg
- Vetpercentage
- 14%
over 10 - 20 jaar zal men met grote verbijstering terugkijken naar het "wir schaffen das " van
2015
- Lid sinds
- 14 jan 2014
- Berichten
- 1.753
- Waardering
- 1.981
- Lengte
- 1m84
- Massa
- 88kg
- Vetpercentage
- 11%
- Lid sinds
- 3 okt 2008
- Berichten
- 35.644
- Waardering
- 35.310
- Lengte
- 1m85
- Massa
- 108kg
- Vetpercentage
- 10%
- Lid sinds
- 30 jul 2010
- Berichten
- 6.701
- Waardering
- 700
- Lengte
- 1m82
Dat artikel zit achter een paywall, kan iemand het hier posten?
- Lid sinds
- 28 nov 2015
- Berichten
- 1.203
- Waardering
- 1.157
- Lengte
- 1m82
- Massa
- 70kg
- Vetpercentage
- 8%
Even énige nuance inbrengen aangezien wel weer heel mooi één kant van het verhaal wordt getoond. Niet dat dan je mening ofzo teniet moet worden gedaan maar meer om ook de andere kant te laten zien.
De EU gaat landen inderdaad betalen per opgenomen vluchteling, dit is echter om de vluchtelingen beter over Europa te verspreiden en het gaat dan op "goedgekeurde" vluchtelingen. Dit zijn dus geen economische geldzoekers maar mensen die gescreend zijn en echt vluchten voor oorlog, geweld, dictatuur etc.
Dat betalen is meer als economische prikkel zodat de "armere" Oostblok landen die nu geen enkele vluchteling opnemen ook gaan meewerken.
Ook zit er een 2e kant aan deze afspraak. De EU gaat niet "goedgekeurde" vluchtelingen zonder verblijfsvergunning uit de opvangkampen in Italië wegsturen. Als de landen waarvan de mensen vandaan komen ze opnemen worden deze beloond met makkelijker visa's krijgen en dergelijke.
Nogmaals er kan dan alsnog veel hierover gezegd worden, mijn bedoeling is ook niet tegen jullie te zijn. Dit is meer om ook de andere kant te laten zien.
- Lid sinds
- 24 aug 2009
- Berichten
- 21.667
- Waardering
- 12.184
Volgens mij laat dat geen andere kant zien maar zijn dat allemaal dingen waar we gewoon geen 500 miljoen aan willen besteden.
Verspreiden, keuren, terugsturen, wordt allemaal al vanaf het begin beweerd maar niet gedaan. En niemand wil die oostblok landen wat opdringen.
Verspreiden, keuren, terugsturen, wordt allemaal al vanaf het begin beweerd maar niet gedaan. En niemand wil die oostblok landen wat opdringen.
Dus dan worden ze afgekeurd om terug te komen met een visa?
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 59.513
- Waardering
- 22.094
- Lid sinds
- 16 mei 2006
- Berichten
- 23.682
- Waardering
- 21.437
Swedish Dentist Reveals 80% of Migrant 'Children' Are Actually Adults – Is Fired and Now May Lose Home
Dental hygienist advised the Migration Board about adult “unaccompanied” – was therefore kicked out of work. Now the entire family property can be confiscated by the region of Gotland, who hired a star lawyer.
It was in July last year that at the time 56-year-old dental hygienist Bernt Herlitz with his wife looked into one of Almedalen’s seminars dealing with age assessment in the judiciary and in the sports world. The theme was urgent for the couple because both of them worked at the Public Health Service in Visby, where many of the so-called unaccompanied refugees turned their teeth. In 2016, the debate on unanimity rose – not least because of the high cost of living, which in some cases could be 6-8 thousand kronor per day.
“I would probably appreciate that up to 80% of them were obviously adults. This can be seen, for example, on wisdom teeth that were fully grown – something that is only seen in adults, Bernt says.
“The suspicions must be reported”
The subject was a snack in the breakfast room, but nobody knew how to ignore the suspicion, according to Bernt. In the aftermath seminar Seminaria participated, among others, Åsa Carlander-Hemingway, a unit manager from the Swedish Migration Board, who told the couple that it is important at the right age and that all suspicions should be reported to the Swedish Migration Board.
Said and done – when he returned to work in August that year Bernt began to advise the Migration Board about his suspicions. In total, he sent more than 8 emails where he stated that he was a dental hygienist and felt that the age stated in the Migration Board’s actions was wrong.
– It is important that the right thing is right – not least because adults do not live with children.
Little Bernard thought what would happen next. He never received any response from the Swedish Migration Board. Instead, one of the official officials forwarded his e-mail to a good man for one of the people the tips were about. Good man, in turn, contacted Bernt’s head at Folktandvården, Mats Kvarnberg. It did not take long before a full commitment was started.
“The manager asked me to come to a single room where there was also another senior manager from the employer, the region of Gotland. They told me I will not go to work tomorrow, that I’m turned off and that there will be an investigation.
How did it feel?
– It felt heavy. But I did not realize the seriousness of it yet. I told you that the woman from the Migration Board had said that I would report. I thought it would be done in a few days and I could get back to work.
But, really, it did not. 14 days later Bernt was dismissed after 10 years of service at Folktandvården. The employer said he broke patient confidentiality, which would have been for his patients.
All three local newspapers on Gotland described him as a dangerous lawyer and turned on right-wing extremists as “age-rated refugees on their own behalf”. The news also reached SVT .
– They wrote about me on the first page without even contacting me. One felt so enormously exposed. Sure, they have not printed my name but Gotland is a small place and everyone knows everyone so it’s not hard to figure out who it’s all about.
But Bernt is neither right-wing or even politically active. His fate is time-consuming in many ways. He is a native gown and has lived all his life on the island. Prior to public care, he worked to build mobile base stations at a factory previously owned by Ericsson. The factory was acquired by Flextronics, which eventually moved production to Hungary and in 2003 closed the business in Visby. Bernt was dismissed.
That’s when he and his wife decided to go for a three-year education at Umeå University to become dental hygienists.
“It would be a reboot for us,” says Bernt.
And then they got a job pretty quickly after finishing education, at the same public health service in Visby.
“It’s quite run for me”
“Job is the most important thing. Everything revolves around it. If you have no job, you have no money, no spare time.
Therefore, he decided to take the fight to get his job back. Bernt’s trade unions refused to help him because he accidentally left the trade unions a couple of months before this happened. This means that he had to pay for legal aid from his own pocket. However, the frustration and upset of the unfair treatment he considers to have been subjected to the region of Gotland was so great that he took it up.
“I am 57 years old and that means that it is quite run on the labor market for me. Region Gotland is a big employer in my industry on the island and no new employment with them is excluded. There are some private options but their interest always ended after the question “Why did you end up at the Region Gotland?”.
Bernt tried to find a job on the mainland. He managed to get a temporary contact in Kalmar County where he commuted with the ferry from the island for three-day shift. In the long run, however, it did not work. At the same time, his wife, who worked in the same workplace, had to go down to half-time and then resign completely.
“She suffered from health problems because of this whole sad situation. It became impossible to proceed simply. It also did not help some colleagues start looking at her, explains Bernt.
In other words, no one had a couple of jobs when a verdict came from Gotland’s district court after nearly a year’s long trial. The District Court’s assessment was that there was no reason for dismissal. On the other hand, the employer had the right to terminate Bernt. In the verdict, the district court maintains that a breach of patient secrecy had occurred – but stressed at the same time that it has not been found that the victims suffered injury because of it and that there may be some exceptions to confidentiality.
It was in July last year that at the time 56-year-old dental hygienist Bernt Herlitz with his wife looked into one of Almedalen’s seminars dealing with age assessment in the judiciary and in the sports world. The theme was urgent for the couple because both of them worked at the Public Health Service in Visby, where many of the so-called unaccompanied refugees turned their teeth. In 2016, the debate on unanimity rose – not least because of the high cost of living, which in some cases could be 6-8 thousand kronor per day.
“I would probably appreciate that up to 80% of them were obviously adults. This can be seen, for example, on wisdom teeth that were fully grown – something that is only seen in adults, Bernt says.
“The suspicions must be reported”
The subject was a snack in the breakfast room, but nobody knew how to ignore the suspicion, according to Bernt. In the aftermath seminar Seminaria participated, among others, Åsa Carlander-Hemingway, a unit manager from the Swedish Migration Board, who told the couple that it is important at the right age and that all suspicions should be reported to the Swedish Migration Board.
Said and done – when he returned to work in August that year Bernt began to advise the Migration Board about his suspicions. In total, he sent more than 8 emails where he stated that he was a dental hygienist and felt that the age stated in the Migration Board’s actions was wrong.
– It is important that the right thing is right – not least because adults do not live with children.
Little Bernard thought what would happen next. He never received any response from the Swedish Migration Board. Instead, one of the official officials forwarded his e-mail to a good man for one of the people the tips were about. Good man, in turn, contacted Bernt’s head at Folktandvården, Mats Kvarnberg. It did not take long before a full commitment was started.
“The manager asked me to come to a single room where there was also another senior manager from the employer, the region of Gotland. They told me I will not go to work tomorrow, that I’m turned off and that there will be an investigation.
How did it feel?
– It felt heavy. But I did not realize the seriousness of it yet. I told you that the woman from the Migration Board had said that I would report. I thought it would be done in a few days and I could get back to work.
But, really, it did not. 14 days later Bernt was dismissed after 10 years of service at Folktandvården. The employer said he broke patient confidentiality, which would have been for his patients.
All three local newspapers on Gotland described him as a dangerous lawyer and turned on right-wing extremists as “age-rated refugees on their own behalf”. The news also reached SVT .
– They wrote about me on the first page without even contacting me. One felt so enormously exposed. Sure, they have not printed my name but Gotland is a small place and everyone knows everyone so it’s not hard to figure out who it’s all about.
But Bernt is neither right-wing or even politically active. His fate is time-consuming in many ways. He is a native gown and has lived all his life on the island. Prior to public care, he worked to build mobile base stations at a factory previously owned by Ericsson. The factory was acquired by Flextronics, which eventually moved production to Hungary and in 2003 closed the business in Visby. Bernt was dismissed.
That’s when he and his wife decided to go for a three-year education at Umeå University to become dental hygienists.
“It would be a reboot for us,” says Bernt.
And then they got a job pretty quickly after finishing education, at the same public health service in Visby.
“It’s quite run for me”
“Job is the most important thing. Everything revolves around it. If you have no job, you have no money, no spare time.
Therefore, he decided to take the fight to get his job back. Bernt’s trade unions refused to help him because he accidentally left the trade unions a couple of months before this happened. This means that he had to pay for legal aid from his own pocket. However, the frustration and upset of the unfair treatment he considers to have been subjected to the region of Gotland was so great that he took it up.
“I am 57 years old and that means that it is quite run on the labor market for me. Region Gotland is a big employer in my industry on the island and no new employment with them is excluded. There are some private options but their interest always ended after the question “Why did you end up at the Region Gotland?”.
Bernt tried to find a job on the mainland. He managed to get a temporary contact in Kalmar County where he commuted with the ferry from the island for three-day shift. In the long run, however, it did not work. At the same time, his wife, who worked in the same workplace, had to go down to half-time and then resign completely.
“She suffered from health problems because of this whole sad situation. It became impossible to proceed simply. It also did not help some colleagues start looking at her, explains Bernt.
In other words, no one had a couple of jobs when a verdict came from Gotland’s district court after nearly a year’s long trial. The District Court’s assessment was that there was no reason for dismissal. On the other hand, the employer had the right to terminate Bernt. In the verdict, the district court maintains that a breach of patient secrecy had occurred – but stressed at the same time that it has not been found that the victims suffered injury because of it and that there may be some exceptions to confidentiality.
Soortgelijke topics
