RobbertK
Ripped Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 26 sep 2007
- Berichten
- 3.512
- Waardering
- 148
No legs, no back, no mass, no life!
- Topic starter RobbertK
- Startdatum
- Recente activiteit Recente activiteit:
- Reacties 633
- Weergaven 22.214
- Volgers 26
Flying Fox
Huge Freak
- Lid sinds
- 30 dec 2005
- Berichten
- 9.256
- Waardering
- 0
- Lid sinds
- 24 mrt 2007
- Berichten
- 11.633
- Waardering
- 224
Even mierenken. Eerder minder hams en glutes, niet zozeer meer quads. (Zie het als incline bench vs flatbench.)
edit: nu twijfel ik zelf ook even. Maar ben er redelijk zeker van. anyway, boeiuh
RobbertK
Ripped Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 26 sep 2007
- Berichten
- 3.512
- Waardering
- 148
Nee, lowbar is niet te weinig quads, het is gewoon minder quads als highbar.
Laatst bewerkt:
RobbertK
Ripped Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 26 sep 2007
- Berichten
- 3.512
- Waardering
- 148
Die gewichten gaan niet vanzelf omhoog als je hams en glutes ineens minder werk doen.
- Lid sinds
- 24 mrt 2007
- Berichten
- 11.633
- Waardering
- 224
Karolinska Institute in
Stockholm, Sweden ,
The researchers recruited eight Swedish national - class
weightlifters for the high-bar squat and six
national-class powerlifters for the low-bar squat.
The conditions called for the subjects to squat with 65%
1rep max to parallel and deeper. Once the data
were collected, the researchers learned that the
a verage peak muscle activity of the biceps femoris,
rectus femoris, and vastus lateralis was higher in the
powerlifters. However, the difference was
statistically significant only for the rectus femoris,
indicating that the peak muscle activity for the
other muscle groups was very similar in both the
high-bar and low-bar squat. What this basically
means is that if you’re looking to incorporate the
high-bar vs. low-bar squat into your routine for the
purpose of developing different muscles, you’re
probably barking up the wrong squat stand.
The data also re vealed that the highest relative
muscle activity for both groups of lifters was in the
biceps femoris, one of the hamstring muscles. This
result seems contradictory to what you might
expect. However, you need to be careful in
interpreting this evidence. It doesn’t mean that the
biceps femoris had the highest muscle activity. The
average muscle activity was relative: the researcher s
had the subjects hold a three-second static squat at
the bottom and measured the muscle activity. All
other measures of muscle activity were related to
this “static reference contraction.” Thus, the biceps
femoris had the highest activity in relation to its
activity when this static squat was held. Basically,
what we can draw from this is that the biceps
femoris is definitely active during both types of
squats, although it may not be what is considered a
“prime mover” during these lifts.
HIGH-BAR VS. LOW BAR,
FRONT SQUAT VS. BACK
SQUAT: OVERALL LITTLE
DIFFERENCE IN MUSCLE
ACTIVITY
Pure Power V2 #6
Stockholm, Sweden ,
The researchers recruited eight Swedish national - class
weightlifters for the high-bar squat and six
national-class powerlifters for the low-bar squat.
The conditions called for the subjects to squat with 65%
1rep max to parallel and deeper. Once the data
were collected, the researchers learned that the
a verage peak muscle activity of the biceps femoris,
rectus femoris, and vastus lateralis was higher in the
powerlifters. However, the difference was
statistically significant only for the rectus femoris,
indicating that the peak muscle activity for the
other muscle groups was very similar in both the
high-bar and low-bar squat. What this basically
means is that if you’re looking to incorporate the
high-bar vs. low-bar squat into your routine for the
purpose of developing different muscles, you’re
probably barking up the wrong squat stand.
The data also re vealed that the highest relative
muscle activity for both groups of lifters was in the
biceps femoris, one of the hamstring muscles. This
result seems contradictory to what you might
expect. However, you need to be careful in
interpreting this evidence. It doesn’t mean that the
biceps femoris had the highest muscle activity. The
average muscle activity was relative: the researcher s
had the subjects hold a three-second static squat at
the bottom and measured the muscle activity. All
other measures of muscle activity were related to
this “static reference contraction.” Thus, the biceps
femoris had the highest activity in relation to its
activity when this static squat was held. Basically,
what we can draw from this is that the biceps
femoris is definitely active during both types of
squats, although it may not be what is considered a
“prime mover” during these lifts.
HIGH-BAR VS. LOW BAR,
FRONT SQUAT VS. BACK
SQUAT: OVERALL LITTLE
DIFFERENCE IN MUSCLE
ACTIVITY
Pure Power V2 #6
- Lid sinds
- 30 nov 2004
- Berichten
- 10.728
- Waardering
- 74
- Lengte
- 1m79
- Massa
- 112kg
Wat een onzin. Alsof low-bar niks voorsteld..
RobbertK
Ripped Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 26 sep 2007
- Berichten
- 3.512
- Waardering
- 148
RobbertK
Ripped Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 26 sep 2007
- Berichten
- 3.512
- Waardering
- 148
WideGrip chins
8xbw
MP
6x50
6x60
Pushpress
2x70
2x75
2x80 pr
1x85 pr
Pushjerk
2x1x90 pr
T-bar ( maatje wou die perse doen
ik vind er niet veel aan )
3 sets
DB Press
8x34 pr
8x36 pr
6x36
8x32
2x6x32
BOR
8x75
3x95
2x5x95
CGBP
2 sets, de 2e set kk harde fail, mede dankzij de gymeigenaar
Dips
11xbw
7xbw
8xbw
6xbw
Curls
Upright Rows
Dropset seated MP
8xbw
MP
6x50
6x60
Pushpress
2x70
2x75
2x80 pr
1x85 pr
Pushjerk
2x1x90 pr
T-bar ( maatje wou die perse doen
ik vind er niet veel aan )3 sets
DB Press
8x34 pr
8x36 pr
6x36
8x32
2x6x32
BOR
8x75
3x95
2x5x95
CGBP
2 sets, de 2e set kk harde fail, mede dankzij de gymeigenaar
Dips
11xbw
7xbw
8xbw
6xbw
Curls
Upright Rows
Dropset seated MP
- Lid sinds
- 8 apr 2007
- Berichten
- 16.013
- Waardering
- 317
- Lengte
- 1m94
- Massa
- 115kg
- Vetpercentage
- 18%
- Lid sinds
- 4 feb 2006
- Berichten
- 28.297
- Waardering
- 1.422
- Lengte
- 1m80
- Massa
- 90kg
Willy7
Competitive Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 17 jan 2007
- Berichten
- 2.701
- Waardering
- 0
WideGrip chins
8xbw
MP
6x50
6x60
Pushpress
2x70
2x75
2x80 pr
1x85 pr
Pushjerk
2x1x90 pr
T-bar ( maatje wou die perse doen
3 sets
DB Press
8x34 pr
8x36 pr
6x36
8x32
2x6x32
BOR
8x75
3x95
2x5x95
CGBP
2 sets, de 2e set kk harde fail, mede dankzij de gymeigenaar
Dips
11xbw
7xbw
8xbw
6xbw
Curls
Upright Rows
Dropset seated MP
Lekkere PR´s!
En wat is de uitleg van het dik gedrukte....?
- Lid sinds
- 21 dec 2005
- Berichten
- 9.654
- Waardering
- 155
- Lengte
- 1m85
- Massa
- 86kg
- Vetpercentage
- 12%
RobbertK
Ripped Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 26 sep 2007
- Berichten
- 3.512
- Waardering
- 148
Gister
Hangclean
tot 80
Pinsquat
tot 170
Backsquat
tot 150
- k*t, overal had minstens 10kg bij moeten zitten
Vandaag:
MP
5x50
3x60
1x70
4x1x70 pr
Pushpress
2x75
1x80
2x80 pr
1x85
MP
4x65 pr
Wide grip pronated chins + supinated chins
4x--5xbw+3xbw pr
Standing OH DB-press, 1 arm
5x24
5x28
5x32 pr?
4x32
7x28 pr
Ecto bench spotting ( pendlay row )
5x5x85, verschillende breedtes met grip
Bench
8x80
5x90
3x95
8x80
haha, maar mijn smoes is dat ik moe was
Face pulls
Triceps
Onderarmen
Hangclean
tot 80
Pinsquat
tot 170
Backsquat
tot 150
- k*t, overal had minstens 10kg bij moeten zitten
Vandaag:
MP
5x50
3x60
1x70
4x1x70 pr
Pushpress
2x75
1x80
2x80 pr
1x85
MP
4x65 pr
Wide grip pronated chins + supinated chins
4x--5xbw+3xbw pr
Standing OH DB-press, 1 arm
5x24
5x28
5x32 pr?
4x32
7x28 pr
Ecto bench spotting ( pendlay row )
5x5x85, verschillende breedtes met grip
Bench
8x80
5x90
3x95
8x80
haha, maar mijn smoes is dat ik moe was
Face pulls
Triceps
Onderarmen
- Lid sinds
- 18 jun 2006
- Berichten
- 6.968
- Waardering
- 1
Vladi
Freaky Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 6 feb 2005
- Berichten
- 6.878
- Waardering
- 123
RobbertK
Ripped Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 26 sep 2007
- Berichten
- 3.512
- Waardering
- 148
Vladi
Freaky Bodybuilder
- Lid sinds
- 6 feb 2005
- Berichten
- 6.878
- Waardering
- 123
- Lid sinds
- 8 apr 2007
- Berichten
- 16.013
- Waardering
- 317
- Lengte
- 1m94
- Massa
- 115kg
- Vetpercentage
- 18%
- Lid sinds
- 21 dec 2005
- Berichten
- 9.654
- Waardering
- 155
- Lengte
- 1m85
- Massa
- 86kg
- Vetpercentage
- 12%