AndroidHealthClinic

Waarom islam verspreid

Status
Niet open voor verdere reacties.
OMg hahahaha

for real

meen je dit

de 9e editie is ouder dan de 7e editie.

Dam just dam

Kan niets hierop zeggen

---------- Toegevoegd om 16:39 ---------- De post hierboven werd geplaatst om 16:38 ----------



welke "vliegende paard"?

In islam hebben we geen vliegende paard.

---------- Toegevoegd om 16:40 ---------- De post hierboven werd geplaatst om 16:39 ----------



Komt naar voren in mijn filmpje ;)
De verwarring kwam er door het verwarren van pagina 6 met 9.

Echter blijft de Engelste tekst correct, alsook de conclusie: de koran kopieerde de reeds toen bekende kennis. DKennis die nu trouwens fout blijkt te zijn.
 
De verwarring kwam er door het verwarren van pagina 6 met 9.

Echter blijft de Engelste tekst correct, alsook de conclusie: de koran kopieerde de reeds toen bekende kennis. DKennis die nu trouwens fout blijkt te zijn.

Gast je bent een en al verwarring

Wat is er fout laat het zien.

Hij zegt niet dat er iets fout is in de koran.

Ik wacht nog steeds op je bewijs kerel..
 
Ancient Views of Human Embryology
Egyptians of the Old Kingdom, approximately 3000 bc,
knew of methods for incubating birds’ eggs, but they left
no records. Akhnaton (Amenophis IV) praised the sun
god Aton as the creator of the germ in a woman, maker
of the seed in man, and giver of life to the son in the body
of his mother. The ancient Egyptians believed that the
soul entered the child at birth through the placenta.
A brief Sanskrit treatise on ancient Indian embryology
is thought to have been written in 1416 bc. This scripture
of the Hindus, called Garbha Upanishad, describes
ancient ideas concerning the embryo. It states:
From the conjugation of blood and semen (seed), the
embryo comes into existence. During the period favorable
for conception, after the sexual intercourse, (it)
becomes a Kalada (one-day-old embryo). After remaining
seven nights, it becomes a vesicle. After a fortnight it
becomes a spherical mass. After a month it becomes a
firm mass. After two months the head is formed. After
three months the limb regions appear.
Greek scholars made many important contributions to
the science of embryology. The first recorded embryologic studies are in the books of Hippocrates of Cos, the
famous Greek physician (circa 460–377 bc), who is
regarded as the father of medicine. In order to understand
how the human embryo develops, he recommended:
Take twenty or more eggs and let them be incubated by
two or more hens. Then each day from the second to that
of hatching, remove an egg, break it, and examine it. You
will find exactly as I say, for the nature of the bird can
be likened to that of man.
Aristotle of Stagira (circa 384–322 bc), a Greek philosopher
and scientist, wrote a treatise on embryology
in which he described development of the chick and
other embryos. Aristotle promoted the idea that the
embryo developed from a formless mass, which he
described as a “less fully concocted seed with a nutritive
soul and all bodily parts.” This embryo, he thought,
arose from menstrual blood after activation by male
semen.


Claudius Galen (circa 130–201 ad), a Greek physician
and medical scientist in Rome, wrote a book, On
the Formation of the Foetus, in which he described
the development and nutrition of fetuses and the structures
that we now call the allantois, amnion, and
placenta.

The Talmud contains references to the formation of
the embryo. The Jewish physician Samuel-el-Yehudi, who
lived during the second century ad, described six stages
in the formation of the embryo from a “formless, rolled-up
thing” to a “child whose months have been completed.”
Talmud scholars believed that the bones and tendons, the
nails, the marrow in the head, and the white of the eyes,
were derived from the father, “who sows the white,” but
the skin, flesh, blood, hair were derived from the mother,
“who sows the red.” These views were according to the
teachings of both Aristotle and Galen.



Embryology in the Middle Ages
The growth of science was slow during the medieval
period and few high points of embryologic investigation
undertaken during this time are known to us. It is cited
in the Quran (seventh century ad), the Holy Book of
islam, that human beings are produced from a mixture
of secretions from the male and female. Several references
are made to the creation of a human being from a nutfa
(small drop). It also states that the resulting organism
settles in the womb like a seed, 6 days after its beginning.
Reference is also made to the leech-like appearance of the
early embryo. Later the embryo is said to resemble a
“chewed substance.”

Constantinus Africanus of Salerno (circa 1020–1087
ad) wrote a concise treatise entitled De Humana Natura.
Africanus described the composition and sequential
development of the embryo in relation to the planets and
each month during pregnancy, a concept unknown in
antiquity. Medieval scholars hardly deviated from the
theory of Aristotle, which stated that the embryo was
derived from menstrual blood and semen. Because of a
lack of knowledge, drawings of the fetus in the uterus
often showed a fully developed infant frolicking in the womb
 
Claudius Galen (circa 130–201 ad), a Greek physician
and medical scientist in Rome, wrote a book, On
the Formation of the Foetus, in which he described
the development and nutrition of fetuses and the structures
that we now call the allantois, amnion, and
placenta.
:cool:
 
  • Like
Waarderingen: mat
Ancient Views of Human Embryology
Egyptians of the Old Kingdom, approximately 3000 bc,
knew of methods for incubating birds’ eggs, but they left
no records. Akhnaton (Amenophis IV) praised the sun
god Aton as the creator of the germ in a woman, maker
of the seed in man, and giver of life to the son in the body
of his mother. The ancient Egyptians believed that the
soul entered the child at birth through the placenta.
A brief Sanskrit treatise on ancient Indian embryology
is thought to have been written in 1416 bc. This scripture
of the Hindus, called Garbha Upanishad, describes
ancient ideas concerning the embryo. It states:
From the conjugation of blood and semen (seed), the
embryo comes into existence. During the period favorable
for conception, after the sexual intercourse, (it)
becomes a Kalada (one-day-old embryo). After remaining
seven nights, it becomes a vesicle. After a fortnight it
becomes a spherical mass. After a month it becomes a
firm mass. After two months the head is formed. After
three months the limb regions appear.
Greek scholars made many important contributions to
the science of embryology. The first recorded embryologic studies are in the books of Hippocrates of Cos, the
famous Greek physician (circa 460–377 bc), who is
regarded as the father of medicine. In order to understand
how the human embryo develops, he recommended:
Take twenty or more eggs and let them be incubated by
two or more hens. Then each day from the second to that
of hatching, remove an egg, break it, and examine it. You
will find exactly as I say, for the nature of the bird can
be likened to that of man.
Aristotle of Stagira (circa 384–322 bc), a Greek philosopher
and scientist, wrote a treatise on embryology
in which he described development of the chick and
other embryos. Aristotle promoted the idea that the
embryo developed from a formless mass, which he
described as a “less fully concocted seed with a nutritive
soul and all bodily parts.” This embryo, he thought,
arose from menstrual blood after activation by male
semen.


Claudius Galen (circa 130–201 ad), a Greek physician
and medical scientist in Rome, wrote a book, On
the Formation of the Foetus, in which he described
the development and nutrition of fetuses and the structures
that we now call the allantois, amnion, and
placenta.

The Talmud contains references to the formation of
the embryo. The Jewish physician Samuel-el-Yehudi, who
lived during the second century ad, described six stages
in the formation of the embryo from a “formless, rolled-up
thing” to a “child whose months have been completed.”
Talmud scholars believed that the bones and tendons, the
nails, the marrow in the head, and the white of the eyes,
were derived from the father, “who sows the white,” but
the skin, flesh, blood, hair were derived from the mother,
“who sows the red.” These views were according to the
teachings of both Aristotle and Galen.



Embryology in the Middle Ages
The growth of science was slow during the medieval
period and few high points of embryologic investigation
undertaken during this time are known to us. It is cited
in the Quran (seventh century ad), the Holy Book of
islam, that human beings are produced from a mixture
of secretions from the male and female. Several references
are made to the creation of a human being from a nutfa
(small drop). It also states that the resulting organism
settles in the womb like a seed, 6 days after its beginning.
Reference is also made to the leech-like appearance of the
early embryo. Later the embryo is said to resemble a
“chewed substance.”

Constantinus Africanus of Salerno (circa 1020–1087
ad) wrote a concise treatise entitled De Humana Natura.
Africanus described the composition and sequential
development of the embryo in relation to the planets and
each month during pregnancy, a concept unknown in
antiquity. Medieval scholars hardly deviated from the
theory of Aristotle, which stated that the embryo was
derived from menstrual blood and semen. Because of a
lack of knowledge, drawings of the fetus in the uterus
often showed a fully developed infant frolicking in the womb

En nu? Wat wil je zeggen?

Waar is de Koran/Islam fout?

I am still waiting!!
 
toch frappant dat thedeen de enige is die de moeite doet om objectief bewijs te bieden voor zijn claims en jullie allemaal als kippen zonder kop in het wilde weg beweringen maken. Dat dan nog terwijl jullie vanuit een positivistisch kader redeneren.

Triest dit.
 
hier wordt je hele argumentatie verkracht, nogmaals

http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Science/embryo.html

.
.
.
In the verses listed above nutfah is used when describing the fluid which gushes out during sexual intercourse and clearly this can only refer to semen. However, Prof. Moore is keen to translate nutfah in sura 76:2 as "mingled fluid" [3] and explains that this Arabic term refers to the male and female fluids which contain the gametes (male sperm and female egg). While it is true that the ancient Greeks would not have been able to see individual sperm or eggs, these only being visible through the microscope, the Qur'an emphatically does not mention sperm or eggs; it simply says nutfah. This can reasonably be translated semen, or at a push, germinal fluid - which was a term used as early as Hippocrates [4] who spoke of male and female reproductive fluids (but obviously could not have been aware of the cells contained in the fluids). If Moore wishes to translate nutfah as germinal fluid, he inadvertently reinforces that the Qur'an is borrowing this term from the Greeks.

Sura 86:6 is interesting since it claims that during the act of sexual intercourse before which a man is created, the "gushing fluid" or semen issues from between the loins and ribs. Semen is apparently coming out of the area around the kidneys and back, which is a real problem for we know that the testicles are the sites of sperm production (although the ancient Greeks were not so convinced. Aristotle for example amusingly believed that they functioned as weights to keep the seminal passages open during sexual intercourse [5]).

The explanation offered by Muslims [6] for the strange statement in this sura relates to the fact that the testicles originally develop from tissue in the area of the kidneys, when the man from whom sperm is gushing forth was himself an embryo. In other words, in a very convoluted fashion the sperm originates from the area between the loins and ribs because that is where the testicles which are producing the sperm originally form.

There is a rather less complicated explanation for this verse however. The Greek physician Hippocrates and his followers taught in the fifth century BC that semen comes from all the fluid in the body, diffusing from the brain into the spinal marrow, before passing through the kidneys and via the testicles into the penis [7]. Clearly according to this view sperm originates from the region of the kidneys, and although there is obviously no substance to this teaching today, it was well-known in Muhammed's day, and shows how the Qur'an could contain such an erroneous statement.
 

lol daar staat 'steed', wat een paard is :p


kan je überhaupt je eigen reet wel afvegen

it is a creature from the heavens which transported the prophets.

Then a white animal which was smaller than a mule and bigger than a donkey was brought to me. ... The animal's step (was so wide that it) reached the farthest point within the reach of the animal's sight.

—Muhammad al-Bukhari, Sahih al-Bukhari[1]

Nergens maar dan ook nergens wordt er gezegd dat het een paard is.
 
toch frappant dat thedeen de enige is die de moeite doet om objectief bewijs te bieden voor zijn claims en jullie allemaal als kippen zonder kop in het wilde weg beweringen maken. Dat dan nog terwijl jullie vanuit een positivistisch kader redeneren.

Triest dit.

karige definitie van objectief heb jij
 
  • Like
Waarderingen: Guts
it is a creature from the heavens which transported the prophets.

Then a white animal which was smaller than a mule and bigger than a donkey was brought to me. ... The animal's step (was so wide that it) reached the farthest point within the reach of the animal's sight.

—Muhammad al-Bukhari, Sahih al-Bukhari[1]

Nergens maar dan ook nergens wordt er gezegd dat het een paard is.

hoe kan er een wezen uit de hemel komen dan

waarom stuurt allah (swt) nu niet dan wezens om het kwade te bestrijden
 
Lees de hele tekst en je hele verhaal valt in duigen.
 
it is a creature from the heavens which transported the prophets.

Then a white animal which was smaller than a mule and bigger than a donkey was brought to me. ... The animal's step (was so wide that it) reached the farthest point within the reach of the animal's sight.

—Muhammad al-Bukhari, Sahih al-Bukhari[1]

Nergens maar dan ook nergens wordt er gezegd dat het een paard is.

JA dat maakt het natuurlijk wel geloofwaardiger.
 
Status
Niet open voor verdere reacties.
Terug
Naar boven