Link 1
Naast de conclusie dit stukje uit de discussie:
With increased lactate production, an accumulation of hydrogen ions occurs. This accumulation is thought to interfere with muscle excitation and contraction coupling via calcium binding to troponin (Devries et al. 1982; Sahlin et al. 1997; Vasquez et al. 2013), causing a reduction in functional capacity of muscle fibres and an increased emphasis on the motor cortex to signal the recruitment of additional larger motor units (Houtman et al. 2003; Sahlin et al. 1997; Vollestad et al. 1984). It is thought that these changes can also lead to elevations in RPE and reduced power output (Hardee et al. 2012). Therefore, by reducing recovery time within resistance training sessions, the practitioner can expect decreased neuromuscular performance, and increased metabolic responses (e.g., [LAC]) and perceived measures of intensity. Furthermore, activation and recruitment of the musculature may change due to increased motor unit signalling required to maintain neuromuscular performance (McCaulley et al. 2009).
Link 2
Supersets geven in ieder geval geen verhoogd energieverbruik (bewering die ik tevens soms voorbij zie komen).
Link 3
Meer total work (TW) in de traditionele sets tov de supersets. En meer post-exercise hypotensie bij traditionele sets, waarschijnlijk veroorzaakt door TW.
Was nog een onderzoek tegengekomen waarbij TW meer was bij traditionele sets tov supersets, maar ben hem even kwijt.